After spending three days asking me questions and deconstruting and problematizing my answers and responses, I was told that
the point of the exercise was to emphasize to you the NEED for you to provide a rigorous and detailed account of your method, written so someone else can follow it, explained academically in analytical and evaluative relation (similarities and differences) to grounded-theory and Freire's dialectics, as well as Popper et al., along with an account of how you perform both the (semi-structured) interviews and the post-interview reflections and dialogue. Alongside this, we need to see selected transcripts of interviews and detailed empirical results, and analysis, before we would publish your work.
So
the point of the exercise was to emphasize to you the NEED for you to
1. provide a rigorous and detailed account of your method,
2. written so someone else can follow it,
3. explained academically in analytical and evaluative relation
4. (similarities and differences) to grounded-theory and Freire's dialectics,
5. as well as Popper et al.,
6. along with an account of how you perform both the (semi-structured) interviews and the post-interview reflections and dialogue.
7. Alongside this, we need to see selected transcripts of interviews and detailed empirical results, and analysis, before we would publish your work.
-
Will do so
Current rating: 0 (0 ratings)